<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Smithers &#187; Moodle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masmithers.com/tag/moodle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masmithers.com</link>
	<description>Learning and Educational Technology in Higher Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBoard, Sakai and Moodle &#8211; Point/Counterpoint at Educause 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/11/06/blackboard-sakai-and-moodle-pointcounterpoint-at-educause-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/11/06/blackboard-sakai-and-moodle-pointcounterpoint-at-educause-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smithers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBoard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moodle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sakai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masmithers.com/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This very interesting discussion was held recently at the Educause 2009 Conference in Denver. Related posts:Comparing the Horizon Report 2009 and Horizon Report 2009 for Australia and New Zealand Public LMS Evaluations Educational Technology and e-Learning Finds for the Week


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/10/07/comparing-horizon-2009-and-horizon-2009-australia-and-new-zealand/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Comparing the Horizon Report 2009 and Horizon Report 2009 for Australia and New Zealand'>Comparing the Horizon Report 2009 and Horizon Report 2009 for Australia and New Zealand</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/20/public-lms-evaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Public LMS Evaluations'>Public LMS Evaluations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/08/08/educational-technology-and-e-learning-finds-for-the-week/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Educational Technology and e-Learning Finds for the Week'>Educational Technology and e-Learning Finds for the Week</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/11/06/blackboard-sakai-and-moodle-pointcounterpoint-at-educause-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insidious Pedagogy &#8211; some thoughts on Lisa Lane&#8217;s article</title>
		<link>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/10/07/insidious-pedagogy-some-thoughts-on-lisa-lanes-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/10/07/insidious-pedagogy-some-thoughts-on-lisa-lanes-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smithers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBoard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moodle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedagogy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masmithers.com/2009/10/07/insidious-pedagogy-some-thoughts-on-lisa-lanes-paper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just read Lisa Lane’s article in First Monday entitled “Insidious pedagogy: How course management systems impact teaching”. I really liked her paper, not least because it raised some issues that I hadn’t considered before regarding default settings in an LMS and the idea of opt in and opt out learning management systems. It


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/20/public-lms-evaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Public LMS Evaluations'>Public LMS Evaluations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/11/30/new-additions-to-public-lms-evaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: New Additions to Public LMS Evaluations'>New Additions to Public LMS Evaluations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/11/06/blackboard-sakai-and-moodle-pointcounterpoint-at-educause-2009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BlackBoard, Sakai and Moodle &#8211; Point/Counterpoint at Educause 2009'>BlackBoard, Sakai and Moodle &#8211; Point/Counterpoint at Educause 2009</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/10/07/insidious-pedagogy-some-thoughts-on-lisa-lanes-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public LMS Evaluations</title>
		<link>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/20/public-lms-evaluations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/20/public-lms-evaluations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smithers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBoard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desire2Learn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moodle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sakai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/20/public-lms-evaluations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many universities are currently, or have recently, reviewed their enterprise LMS including my own employer. Unfortunately we haven’t made our review process public but many universities have been generous enough to provide information about their reviews. The following list are some of the publicly available LMS reviews that I have found. These were really useful


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/11/30/new-additions-to-public-lms-evaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: New Additions to Public LMS Evaluations'>New Additions to Public LMS Evaluations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/07/10/learning-management-systems-at-australian-universities/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Learning Management Systems at Australian Universities'>Learning Management Systems at Australian Universities</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/11/06/blackboard-sakai-and-moodle-pointcounterpoint-at-educause-2009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BlackBoard, Sakai and Moodle &#8211; Point/Counterpoint at Educause 2009'>BlackBoard, Sakai and Moodle &#8211; Point/Counterpoint at Educause 2009</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/20/public-lms-evaluations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning Management Systems at Australian Universities</title>
		<link>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/07/10/learning-management-systems-at-australian-universities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/07/10/learning-management-systems-at-australian-universities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smithers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlackBoard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning Management Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moodle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sakai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebCT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masmithers.com/2009/07/10/learning-management-systems-at-australian-universities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During April, 2009 I carried out an informal bit of research to see what Australian universities were using as their principal, enterprise wide Learning Management System (LMS). This was simply based on visiting each university web site and attempting to find out which LMS was being used. This was easier in some cases than others.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/20/public-lms-evaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Public LMS Evaluations'>Public LMS Evaluations</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2010/06/27/the-size-of-universities-in-australia-and-the-uk/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Size of Universities in Australia and the UK'>The Size of Universities in Australia and the UK</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.masmithers.com/2009/09/29/why-my-personal-learning-network-is-important-to-me/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why my Personal Learning Network is Important to Me'>Why my Personal Learning Network is Important to Me</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.masmithers.com/2009/07/10/learning-management-systems-at-australian-universities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
